Infinity and Paradox

A stable and balanced system relies on the existence of distinct individuals. These differences are not always a source of disorder but might be the essential foundation that maintains the stability of the whole. Each person functions as a localized point of observation, shaped by their specific relative perspectives on the immediate environment and circumstances.

This unique placement determines the development of various belief systems, scientific theories, and religious frameworks. Because no two people occupy the exact same space and time, or history, their interpretations of the world will naturally diverge.

Conflict between people doesn’t stem from a disagreement over a fundamental truth. Instead, it arises from a need to defend the validity of one’s own perspective. People do not struggle for the sake of the message they receive, but for the perceived superiority of the position from which it was sent. From a place of superiority that might not be accepted.

Thus, it is relevant to know that Truth itself is universal and omnipresent, existing everywhere at all times. Every individual serves as a necessary but limited receiver for this information. While any single person can only process a small portion of the total data, the Absolute Truth remains present at every coordinate.

Individual identity is revealed to be a temporary concentration of meaning around a physical core, and not the core itself. Success and failure are recognized as transient conditions rather than defining characteristics.

Stability, collective or subjective, arises not from sameness but from distinct perspectives held. Each individual is a necessary lens through which universal truth is observed, and from distinct perspectives, stability arises because of the averaging out.

Get new posts and insights from me straight to your inbox.