About

This work is a laboratory of applied philosophy, an exhaustive mapping of the Infinite and the Paradox. Born from journals and explorations, this journey seeks not intellectual knowledge, but direct Realization through experience.

Ethics concerns itself with the distinction between good and evil. Let us imagine the classical dilemma of a runaway train heading toward an imminent disaster — on the tracks ahead stand two groups of people, and a lever allows the train to be diverted from one track to the other. Any choice will result in the death of one of the groups. Are we capable of deciding who should be sacrificed? If neither group is guilty or deserving of punishment, there may be a mathematical solution — saving the greater number, for instance — but is that enough to justify the sacrifice of innocents for the sake of others, also without their consent?

As a human discipline, ethics must confront these extreme situations. It seems to me that we arrive at a disturbing conclusion: some evils are unavoidable. It is from this recognition that I propose a meta-ethics — not a direct reflection on good and evil, but on how to minimize suffering while knowing that some pain will always be inescapable.

There is also a responsibility for those who believe they understand these questions: the responsibility to make themselves heard, even if only to open a space for dialogue about this deeply human condition, which Buddha himself already reflected upon.

When every rational calculus reaches its breaking point, what remains is not certainty but wonder. It is in this space — where moral reasoning falters and undefeatable meanings begin — that another kind of understanding emerges.

Here, logical thought meets its limit and embraces the make-believe of the Divine Child who plays with Reality. I write to organize the fragments of a consciousness that, upon touching the Absolute, discovered itself to be Transparent. I consider myself to be an artisan of the Infinite.

I do not avoid the Paradox; within it I find the seal of Truth. This is an invitation to peel back the layers of identity until only Being remains.

Whether through the analysis of superdeterminism or the contemplation of wild nature, this space serves to remind me that Enlightenment is the act of remembering what we already are. It is the record of a return home, where Mystery is the only true foundation.

Here are some of the central points that explain why the Paradox is necessary and even a sign of truth within this worldview:

1. Paradox as the Seal of Truth

I state that to enter into contradiction when trying to explain something in its essence means having spoken the Truth. This happens because the nature of the Absolute contains within itself all possibilities, including opposing ones. If a theory about the Universe does not accommodate contradictory viewpoints and its own negation, it fails to be universal. Paradox is not a failure of reasoning, but the ultimate limit of human thought when faced with the Infinite.

2. The Insufficiency of Language

The attempt to translate the magnitude of certain subjective experiences into language is where Paradox becomes most evident. Words are tools of delimitation, while Absolute Consciousness is limitless. For example, when you utter the word “Infinite,” you are condensing something that never ends into a single linguistic unit, which is, in itself, a lived contradiction.

3. The Perspective of the “Child” and Make-believe

My worldview suggests that the Universe is the Child at play. For the Child (or the Painter — another analogy), there are no rigid rules of logic; make-believe is what makes reality real. When I write, I am manipulating concepts that are, at their core, loose ends from beginning to end. Reaching the point of contradicting myself, even if I try the best I can to be logically sound, I believe that, regardless, the Paradox will persist in one form or another. But this is not an error. It is the sign that one has come close to the original spontaneity of Absolute Consciousness.

4. The Duality of Identity

There is a constant tension between one’s human “self” (limited and fractured) and one’s Divine “Self” (whole and Infinite).

As a human, I state: “I know nothing.”
As Divinity, I state: “I know everything.”

This coexistence of certainty and doubt is the foundation of my exploration. Writing about infinitude requires me to be the bag that contains all other bags, encompassing both belief and disbelief, yes and no.

5. Writing as Therapy for the Absolute

The truth is that I write because I was traumatized by the direct experience of Absolute Infinity. Since there is no psychotherapist, or any person for that matter, capable of accompanying that depth, writing serves to organize the fragments of that experience that, naturally, appear disconnected and absurd. Writing serves to confabulate really well, to better invent stories, which allows Absolute Truth to become bearable, livable, and even enjoyable in everyday life.